

| AMSI : Political Parties Favor Personal Interests, Plot to Divide Iraq Continues |
|
|
| Thursday, 05 April 2007 15:28 | |||
Spokesman of the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq (AMSI) tells al-Zaman: Iraq's neighbors, who wish good for Iraq,
should realize and appreciate Iraq's national demands While Iraq was witnessing bloody events due to the Samarra bombings and the violence that followed, which raised fear of the eruption of a sectarian conflicts, the spokesman of the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq (AMSI) Dr Muthanna Hareth al-Dhari visited Cairo. During the visit, Mustafa Amarah correspondent of al-Zaman interviewed with Muthanna Hareth al-Dhari.
(al-Zaman) - What are the goals of your current visit to Egypt? (Muthanna al-Dhari) - It comes within the framework of visits by the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq (AMSI) representatives to a number of Arab countries to explain the actual facts in Iraq to Arab media outlets, non-governmental organizations, and religious institutions. This is because the picture of the Iraqi situation has not been made clear yet, and the influence of Arabs is still below the required level. We have met with al-Azhar Sheikh, Ambassador Bin Hili and others.
(Muthanna al-Dhari) - Certainly, the true Iraqis were not responsible for the bombing. From the very beginning, all indications suggested that some local and foreign parties, who do not wish any good for Iraq, planned and executed the attack. The timing of the bombing was very sensitive; hence a civil war could have been erupted in the country. In addition, we hold the Iraqi Government responsible for what happened because it is responsible for the protection of the Holy Shrine. There was a curfew and soon after the withdrawal of security forces, the bombing took place. This was from a security point of view. However, from a political point of view, the interests of several parties lay in the deterioration of the political situation in the Iraqi arena, especially following the emergence of a tendency toward a national consensus. Moreover, the occupation is directly responsible for the decline in the Iraqi situation that paved the way before the bombings. (al-Zaman) - Why did the Shiite parties not adhere to the calls by al-Sistani and al-Sadr not to attack Sunni mosques? (Muthanna al-Dhari) - The masses, which attacked and sabotaged Sunni mosques on the second and third days, did not adhere to the calls by Shiite religious authorities because they were driven by their emotions. In addition, they were directed by some parties who took advantages of the masses' outrage. Stemming from this base, we did not support the idea of calling on people to demonstrate, because some parties might penetrate the demonstrations and turn them to its personal interests. I believe that the current political parties in the Iraqi arena are trying to exploit the religious authorities to achieve their own personal interests rather than the national interests. (al-Zaman) - Are the Iraqi Shiite parties loyal to Iran? (Muthanna al-Dhari) - The current political parties in the Iraqi arena favor their own personal interests over Iraq's national interests. I cannot comment on whether or not they are loyal to Iran. (al-Zaman) - Why did the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq (AMSI) make bilateral agreements with Muqtada al-Sadr but not with the other parties?
(Muthanna al-Dhari) - The Iraqi arena is witnessing a large variety of uncontrolled acts now that cannot be attributed to a particular party.
(Muthanna al-Dhari) - We do not expect that these operations will come to an end. However, we anticipate that this understanding prevents their expansion. With regard to the measures taken to confront such incidents, we have issued our instructions to all mosque imams and clerics to be cautious. We vow to be the guardian and will protect our mosques with our souls.
(Muthanna al-Dhari) - Civil war has not begun in Iraq yet. Civil wars have their elements and features, among which all parties assemble behind their leaders. So far, this has not happened in Iraq. I believe that the efforts that have been invested and will be invested in the next few days will prevent the danger of civil war. However, as long as fear of the reemergence of such incidents exists, we must be prepared to confront them. (al-Zaman) - Do you believe that the United States seeks to instigate a civil war in Iraq in the current stage? (Muthanna al-Dhari) - The US is really determined to get out of Iraq due to the growing internal pressure as well as the huge casualties incurred by US forces as a result of the Iraqi resistance operations. The US Administration is divided into two groups over the Iraqi issue. The first emphasizes the importance of organizing the situation in Iraq in one way or another to show the achievement of some degree of understanding to facilitate the withdrawal of US forces from the country. The second group tends to favor the interests of Israel rather than the interests of the US by trying to instigate a civil war in order to occupy Iraqis with ethnic and sectarian war away from Israel.
(Muthanna al-Dhari) - Iraq's neighbors, who wish good for Iraq, should realize and appreciate Iraq's national demands. It is true that neighboring countries have their own interests that they want to maintain in Iraq, but we do not accept that they attain their interests at the expense of Iraqis. Although, they may not appear explicitly on the surface, serious and well-engineered attempts are certainly underway to divide Iraq by some parties, especially occupation forces. The occupation is trying to implement Iraq's division quietly and gradually, so that the Iraqi people remain unaware of what is being cooked for them. The Wednesday incident was an attempt to probe the reaction of Iraqis. (al-Zaman) - How do you assess the Egyptian and Arab role towards Iraq? (Muthanna al-Dhari) - The Egyptian and Arab role towards Iraq has not reached the required level. We blame Egypt in particular for its distinguished position in the Arab world. (al-Zaman) - What is the projected role that Egypt should play in your opinion?
(Muthanna al-Dhari) - The initiative of al-Azhar Sheikh is a noble gesture and is appreciated. Also his visit to the Iraqi Embassy in Cairo was very well received and appreciated by Iraqis. However, the problem in Iraq is too big to be resolved by a certain visit. It is a complicated political problem rather than a matter of preaching and guidance.
(Muthanna al-Dhari) - The conference faces several obstacles. I do not understand why it was postponed until that time. It is strange that the Iraqi security forces did not allow Arab League Envoy Mustafa Uthman Ismail to visit the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq (AMSI) headquarters, during his last visit to Baghdad. With regard to our stance, it depends on the implementation of the recommendations adopted by the Cairo National Conciliation Conference. (al-Zaman) - What is your stance regarding the deployment of Arab forces or the appointment of Arab diplomatic missions in Iraq?
(Muthanna al-Dhari) - Iraq has no future under the occupation and the control of some political forces who favor their personal interests over Iraq's national interests. However, the withdrawal of occupation forces will lead to the disappearance of such political forces and emergence of other national forces who will work to achieve Iraq's interests. This interview was re-edited by AMSI Press Department. Originally published on 16 March 2006 in al-Zaman in Arabic which is Baghdad based independent Iraqi daily providing coverage of Iraqi, Arab, and international issues, headed by Iraqi journalist Sa'd al-Bazzaz
|